Now how about this picture:
Last night Iowans almost couldn't decide between a loser who couldn't win re-election in his own home state and a Democrat. Just to add insult to injury they also really liked a Libertarian who wants to disband the military. Three days ago Bobo couldn't decide between adding an extra blocker on #2 and stretching the field with much faster WR's. In the end Iowans (who mind you enjoy that child molester look) picked a Democrat and On New Year's day I Has A Crayon just decided to split the difference and run a 165lbs tailback up the gut.
Now for the real question:
Which of these is better-
I Has A Crayon- Heavy Metal Edition
OR
I Has A Crayon- Rap Edition
You're a fucking moron if you think Ron Paul wants to disband the military. Do some research and find out where somebody actually stands on things before you act like you know something. Disband the military? How bout just bringing them home to defend this country; which is the only thing that the Constitution charges the Federal Government to do. Read something instead of just allowing Fox News to influence your views, so that you can pollute others.
ReplyDelete-Anon @ 5:58
ReplyDeleteWell that didn't take long. I have to wonder Anon.....are you a Georgia Football fan or just one of the few thousand morons who are totally loyal to Ron Paul? Do you spend your day responding to all anti-Paul internet info you can find?
Ron Paul will never be the Republican Nominee.
Ron Paul will never be President.
Ron Paul is a Loon.
Ron Paul would allow Iran to have a nuclear bomb, case closed he is absurd.
Anyone who supports Ron Paul is an idiot and shouldn't be allowed to vote.
You might want to check your facts, son. Ron Paul has been around for a while and has said a lot of things that can hurt someone when they are pretending to be a Republican and running for President. Things like how he would deal with the military.
Ron Paul may run third party to ensure Obama wins.
For you information I have difficulty stomaching Fox News or should I say the "Media-Wing of the Romney Campaign". Just because someone likes a Conservative candidate does not mean they adore the RINO News Network.
-Anon @ 5:58
ReplyDeleteI almost forgot your........
" How bout just bringing them home to defend this country; which is the only thing that the Constitution charges the Federal Government to do."
Maybe re-reading that document would help you out. The military takes the fight overseas so that the fight isn't brought here. With "interpreting skills" like that you should consider a career as a Federal Judge...after all the Constitution apparently says whatever you want it to say.
Die hard Dawg fan. From your headline, I was hoping you had news on hopefully the departure of Bobo. Instead I find someone that does not provide facts to back up his positions.
ReplyDeleteUS Constitution. Article 1, Section 8, Clauses 11-16
The federal government can set standard weights and measures, coin money, maintain armed forces, regulate interstate and foreign trade, establish foreign policy, declare war, make all laws necessary and proper for carrying out delegated powers, admit new states, and establish post offices. So where do you see that the government has the power to invade a country without a declaration of war from Congress? Congress has not declared war since December 11,1942. Every candidate other than Ron Paul supports the War on Terror even though any war in a foreign land without a declaration of war is unconstitutional. Furthermore, where does it state in the constitution that any president has the authority to allow or not allow another sovereign nation to do anything?
-Anon @10:24
ReplyDeleteYou said "bring them home and defend this country" as if defending could not include fighting abroad.
I agree with the getting a dec. of war but I am also for carpet bombing people into oblivion and then NOT rebuilding their country (call me old fashioned). The fact that Paul would ignore a nuclear Iran shows how absurd he is and that he shouldn't be seriously considered for dog-catcher.
I like the Hiroshima approach...just kill em all- especially with the middle east. We should just make everything not Israel a nice new parking lot for Israel.
Anon, can at least get your pick for the better version of the I Has A Crayon Song?
"I deem [one of] the essential principles of our government, and consequently [one] which ought to shape its administration,…peace, commerce, and honest friendship with all nations, entangling alliances with none." Thomas Jefferson. Since you seem to think that you believe in the Constitution, why is it that you are not supporting the only candidate that has consistently voted in accordance with the Constitution more so than any other politician since 1937? When they first began to keep those stats. What things has Ron Paul said that would hurt him. Absolutely zero of the candidates would make any effort to repeal the Patriot Act, or the National Defense Authorization Act, both of which are direct violations of our Bill of Rights. If Dr. Paul were in favor of disbanding the military, why does he receive twice the amount of donations from active duty military than all the other candidates combined? National Defense means a strong defense of this nation, how is that the priority of our government, as they close down military bases in this country, while building new ones in foreign lands?
ReplyDeleteMetal, don't even have to watch it to know that.
ReplyDeleteLook, I understand that you may not agree with what Ron Paul says about some things. But what you need to realize is that establishment republicans and democrats put on the charade of opposing each other. But when you look at the fundamental policies that Obama, Romney, Gingrich, Santorum, Bush, Clinton, and so on, you find out that they are all the same. They just think that they can manage these policies better than each other. They all say that we are a democracy. We are not. At least that's not what we were founded as. We were founded as a republic. There is a huge difference. A democracy is 2 wolves and a sheep voting on what's for dinner. Both parties have brainwashed Americans into thinking that 51% rules the other 49%, and this is how they continue to take our liberties. You may not agree with Ron Paul, but he is the only candidate that wants you to have the freedom to disagree with him.
Anon, I understand the Paul Disciple argument. However, you have to agree that Paul is not a Republican he is a Libertarian. Yet he is running as a Republican. He should call himself a Libertarian and run for President as a Libertarian. Just like Obama is a Communist not a Democrat. He should have run as the Communist nominee. Just like Lincoln was a Whig and not a Republican. Just like Romney is a Democrat not a Republican. John McCain, Chris Christie, Lindsay Graham are all Democrats not Republicans, We do have a two party and that is not going to change anytime soon. I just want a guy like Paul to say what he is and stop gumming-up the works for the Republican Party.
ReplyDeleteYou may think that I am against war. That is not the case, and I agree with you that if congress declares war, we should go into it without mercy towards our enemies. Understand this though. We have over 190 military bases in countries other than our own. How would Americans feel if China had a military base in the United States? The status quo for this corrupt government is for us to police the world. Meanwhile, we are broke, and cannot afford to occupy all these bases. Not to mention the blowback caused by our governments desire to instill it's values on everyone else, whether they like it or not. We have absolutely no business trying to force the world to be like us. We have enough problems here that we need to get in order, before we send 1 more soldier to die, or $1 to foreign aid.
ReplyDeleteThe reason why he is running as republican is because the two party system has enacted laws that do not allow some votes to be counted unless the voter is registered as one of the two parties of which they vote for. He does not shy away from being a Libertarian. They have the deck stacked in such a way to ensure that no other party will ever be elected President. This is the reason why he is on the republican ticket. Besides that, he does stand for what the Constitution says, like every politician of any party should do. Why does it matter what party anyone affiliates itself with, as long as they honor the oath of office they took to uphold the principles of the Constitution?
ReplyDeleteoh yes, & the Newtster is such a bonafide conservative, huh CC? Speaking of saying things that can hurt you as a "Republican" running for POTUS, how 'bout Neutard's take on the federal gov't taking over health care and his stance on global warming? Oh yeah, he later said that was all a mistake, er....OK sure, pal.
ReplyDeleteLookie here, the bitch is back. Come on 88, tell us how great your boy Dabo is again?
ReplyDelete-88
ReplyDeleteIf we are going to compare Conservatism there is no comparison.
I believe Newt said a mandate would help drive down cost but that would be coupled with allowing all health insurance companies unfettered competition in all states. It essentially becomes like car insurance. You have to have car insurance to drive a car and no one cries about that because car ins co. can compete. So if you use a hospital you either have to pay up front or have insurance. Newt was not talking about forcing it on people but about people doing the right thing and having insurance or paying one or the other. We have laws that will not allow a hospital to turn someone away from the ER. That law requires the hospital to essentially work for free. So if you are going to force them to take on all comers you have to do something to protect their money. Romney/Obama-Care is not the answer--free competition is.
Again, on global warming the evidence he was presented with was that it existed. Further research showed that it is either all BS (my vote) or it is all inconclusive. There is a big difference in forming an opinion based on research and then changing your mind based on additional research. Mitt Romney can't even decide what his favorite movie is!
You are absolutely correct when you say that their is no comparisons between Newt's and anyone else's conservatism. The reason being Newt is no conservative-
ReplyDelete“The American challenge in leading the world is compounded by our Constitution… either we are going to have to rethink our Constitution, or we are going to have to rethink our process of making decisions.”
That is a direct quote from Gingrich in 1995 when he served as speaker of the house. Gingrich is a member of the Council of Foreign Relations. Which is a progressive organization that advocates the surrender of our national sovereignty and the implementation of World Government. Gingrich recently compared himself to Teddy Roosevelt, the father of the progressive movement in the US that began our slide towards Socialism and big government. Newt Gingrich is no conservative. He is an establishment progressive that wants to do away with the US Constitution as well as our national sovereignty, in favor of world government.
Dabo had a bad game. I'm sure he's the only coach in FBS history to do that. Pretty sure a dude who looked a lot like Dabo, wearing orange, was selected as the Bobby Dodd Coach of the Year for 2011.. But you're right, he's no G. Patterson, who went 1-2 in TCU's "big games" vs. Baylor, TCU, & BSU, giving up 125 friggin pts & only beating BSU because their kicker pulled a Blair Walsh..
ReplyDeleteDabo sucks, which is why he beat Auburn, FSU, VT, BC, Maryland, & UNC on consecutive weeks, averaging over 40 pts/game in that stretch..
Stick to hoops, Dirty Sanchez. Nobody cares about that, so you can suck & it won't matter..
Wow 88, he beat some ACC teams. Must be tough. And Coach of the Year? I'm impressed, he must really be good with all those late season collapses and beat downs from quality teams.
ReplyDeleteKeep on bitchin 88, sooner or later you might not be recognized as the whiny, mouth breather bitch you really are.
Yes, Sanchez, Coach of the Year. Last year's winner was Petersen from BSU. Year before it was GPatt!
ReplyDeleteHow come you guys never post during working hours? Tough to do that when you're sitting in your pre-algebra class making faces at Mary Jane Rottencrotch in the back of the classroom?
There is quite a difference between those two, and Dabo. Be careful 88, you and your IPTAY buddies might be in trouble with Dwayne Allen letting the cat out of the bag. As for your other comment, it just continues your well established trend of reading comprehension failure and total idiocy.
ReplyDeleteSo the 1st conspiracy was that I was posting under multiple names, & now I'm an IPTAY guy? Can't wait for your next brainfart theory, Paco..
ReplyDeleteYour obsession with Dabo is telling, and no, your bitch ways have never been accused of "posting under multiple names", but reading comprehension has never been your strong suit.
ReplyDelete