Da' Dream Makin' Cold Blooded Sausage

Loading...

Tuesday, February 7, 2012

All the SEC New Comers You Need to Know.

According to ESPN the SEC pulled 54 of the top 150 recruits.  That means that over 1/3 of the top talent will be suiting up in the SEC and the remaning less than 2/3 of the players will be distributed to all the other teams in the country.  According to the Top 100 over at Rivals the SEC pulled 31 of the top 100.  Again over 1/3 of the players considered to be elite.  

Two players per program that you will need to keep an eye on this season:

EAST

Georgia:
John Theus           OT
Josh Harvey-Clemons  LB

Florida:
Jonathan Bullard   DE
Dante Fowler Jr.  DE

Tennessee:
Jason Croom   WR
Deion Bonner   DB

South Carolina:
Shaq Roland    WR
Chaz Elder       DB

Vanderbilt:
Andrew Jelks    OL
Caleb Azubike  DE

Kentucky:
Patrick Towles  QB
Jordan Swindle  OL

Missouri:  **We still refuse to consider this to be an actual SEC program**
Dorial Green-Beckham  WR
Evan Boehm       OL

WEST

Alabama:
Landon Collins   S
Dillon Lee          LB

Auburn:
Cassanova McKinzy   LB
JaQuay Williams    WR

Arkansas:
Otha Peters     LB
Jonathan Williams  RB

LSU:
Vadal Alexander   OL
Derek Edinburgh   OL

Ole Miss:
I'Tavius Mathers    RB
Channing Ward     DE

Mississippi St.
Quay Evans          DT
Richie Brown        LB

Texas AnM:
Trey Williams       RB
Matt Davis           QB


15 comments:

  1. 31 of the Top 100 is not more than 1/3....just saying.

    ReplyDelete
  2. SRQDawgs15

    Ah yes that would be 33.3 of the 100. Then again we no longer allowed to count people as a fraction of a person ever since Mr. Lincoln's war.

    Then again if I was good at Math this would either be a Georgia Tech blog or a blog about Japanese Cartoons.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Actually 33.3 would be equal to 1/3 not more than 1/3...so 34 would be more than 1/3, no need to count people as a fraction......not sure how knowing what percentage a fraction equals makes you a GT fan but whatever.....you must be the kind of people who think its "cool" to get bad grades and anyone who actually studies is "such a dork." But I assume you want our players to keep their grades high enough to maintain eligibility too? Grow up....being smart isn't a negative trait!

      Delete
  3. "We are no longer allowed"

    darn you mobile intrawebs device!

    ReplyDelete
  4. -SRQ

    I don't do this very often but..........my.....ahhhemmm...LAW Degree does....well....verify that I did at some point care about grades.

    You say:
    "you must be the kind of people who think its "cool" to get bad grades and anyone who actually studies is "such a dork." "
    To answer that question....No I am not black. I assume that was a back handed racial slur….Am I allowed to make tremendous leaps in logic based on what someone has typed? We have gone from accusations of racism to being called Black. The wonders on new readers never cease.

    As for your other question:
    "But I assume you want our players to keep their grades high enough to maintain eligibility too?"
    Well I guess you're right. What I would really want is a HC that rules with such authority and an Administration that understands the importance of football to a degree that the Professors would know better than to fail a player.

    As far as your quote that we addressed:
    "you must be the kind of people who think its "cool" to get bad grades and anyone who actually studies is "such a dork." "

    Your grammar is atrocious....kind of people who think it's......not its.....you have combined it and is into a single word so please show this action to the reader. See while you were paying attention in math class I was paying attention in English.

    You Asians and your math.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Wow...showing your true colors CC. I never thought or said anything racial as many people of all ethnicity think that way. Your law degree may suggest one thing, but your comments say another. And how does one error equals atrocious grammar? With that sort of logic I'm just glad you're not my lawyer. About that grammatical error, sorry, I guess you also missed the lack of punctuation throughout the post and the fact that this is a blog comment not a thesis. Nice racist post, you not only managed to insult black people but Asians as well. Congrats!

      Delete
    2. LOL...I meant "ethnicities" "one error equal"....just to save you from nitpicking my post instead of addressing the substance of the post.

      Delete
    3. We don't nitpick errors in fact we usually loath people who do but this is of your own doings.....correcting our math. We are sensitive about our math.

      We also don't concern ourselves with grammah' check the profile son The Rider lives by the Faulkner rules-- Periods are for the weak!

      Delete
  5. SRQ

    Whoa whoa whoa......are you such a raging racist that you don't even know the racism rules? I called you a racist first which gives me the automatic high ground. You can't just call me a racist that makes you even racistier (if that is not a word then you a welcome Mr. Webster).

    So what is your "substance".....my math error or that the SEC is not dominant?

    ReplyDelete
  6. No....I made a statement about not valuing education and you immediately associate that with black folks...that is why you are racist here and I'm not. Nothing I said pertains to race in any way and your stereotyping is the only reason race is being discussed. The substance, in this case, is the math which you disregarded in order to make random insults....but, as anyone who's ever disagreed with you can attest to, you often do not address the issue and instead resort to name calling and such. Now you insist you don't nitpick when that is exactly what you are doing. You can't have it both ways and this post (and most on this site, including numerous posts today) and the comments just so how far you will stretch to discredit UGA, Coach Richt, and anyone who actually supports the program instead of constantly tearing it down.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. should be "show" not "so" in the last sentence....its nice when people can see their own mistakes, isn't it? Not that you would know anything about that.

      Delete
  7. -SRQ

    Well that took long enough. You should have just said that we aren't real fans because we don't blindly follow the teaching of your prophet.
    "just so how far you will stretch to discredit UGA, Coach Richt, and anyone who actually supports the program instead of constantly tearing it down."
    You should have just started there SRQ. You haven't read the site for very long because that argument is sooooooooo 2010. You are currently within what we have called the Clampsun Trap (see Clampsun fans during the last five years of the Tummy Bowden regime). Now I am not going to back track and spoon feed you SRQ so check the archives and try to get yourself some help.
    We are actually much better fans of the program than you because we demand excellence while you cling to moral victories.

    As to the racism did you see what happened there? I will use this as a teachable moment. I called you a racist and you attempted to defend yourself in true dumb white guy fashion. What you should have done is refused to acknowledge the allegation and there for removed all of the power that word possesses. Racist only works when a honkey like you allows it. The concept of not valuing education is not exclusive to the black community but it is prevalent in the culture of black Southerners. Now, when Newt Gingrich says poor people don't have a work ethic it is assumed that poor people are lazy and blacks are usually thought of as poor and lazy. Therefore, Newt is using "code" according to Al Sharpton. You have also used code (despite the fact that you did not mean that....thus the humor in my saying it).

    Now your original comment was about my math in a smart ass way. I responded in kind without any attack then you made the turn towards insults. You see Mitt Romney you can't complain about negative ads when you started them. Also, you may want to contain your arguments to one blog post per day so as not to get yourself all confused again.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I really don't know how to respond to this gibberish.....I guess, for your family's, I hope your courtroom arguments are a little more coherent.

      Delete
    2. "your family's sake

      Delete
    3. Really?

      We had just gotten to your actual point of us not being "real supporters" of the program.

      Are you sure you don't want to compare all the things you hold as important to what we hold as important? Sure you don't want to talk about what "good young men" Richt produces and all that ROP non-sense. You sure you don't want to explain all about how us wanting to win at all costs makes us bad fans? Sure you don't want to explain how wins aren't as important as all your moral victories? I mean helping ROPs recover is what we do here at S&G.

      Delete