1/4 of the Season Down.....A Little Less Disney POV.

So Brothah Sanchez has given his review of the team with the 1st quarter of the season down.  It was very optimistic and to be quite honest with you.......believe it or not........even the Ol' Rider is all smiles today.  However, let's not pile up on that 12-0 bandwagon just yet.

So what could stop us from a 12-0 run and the SEC East crown?

Yep.....he is still gainfully employed at your favorite University despite showing more times than I got fingers and toes that he is woefully inadequate to dial em' up against the Big Boys.  Now there is no need for us to review the Buffalo and FLATL games.  We put a drumming on the Bills and the Artists formerly known as the Fighting Schnellenberger's.  Was it sloppy?  Yeah of course it was because they are foregone conclusion cupcakes and most people play those teams that way.  Missouri is a little more problematic.

First of all the score was in no way indicative of the game that was played in Columbia, MO.  The score was however, par for the course in terms of providing Richt-O-Philes with ammo to skew the offensive numbers as a reason to keep Bobo once again next year.  Missouri is still (and in all honestly probably always will be) a Big XII team.  The difference between a SEC school and everyone else is depth.  You see a SEC team may have a starting DE that is a nine out of ten and a Big XII or ACC school may also have a DE that is a nine out of ten.  The difference is that with the SEC school the second guy on the depth chart is an eight out of ten and the third guy is a seven out of ten.  On the other hand the Big XII or ACC team's second guy is a six out of ten and their third guy is a four out of ten.  That is important because what you should usually see happen is a decent game for 1 quarter, the SEC team looking like the better team in the 2nd quarter, the SEC team obviously better and pulling away in the 3rd and, domination in the 4th quarter. 

In the Missouri game at no point did the offense look as if they had broken the will of Missouri.  In fact our Defense is so good that they broke the will of Missouri's offense and defense with little or no help from the offense.  Now, the O-line has been better than I thought they would be, Gurley looks like a beast, and Murray is well.......Murray.  So why did the offense look like a white guy from Kansas in Atlanta during Freaknick?  Here again is your answer:


Out finking de bade guys.

Our biggest problem is that we are about to enter into the meat of our SEC schedule and if the best way to win the SEC was with sloppy, clumsy, slow developing plays and false start penalties......well National Title here we come.  Vandy is essentially in the same boat with Missouri in that they lack overall depth so we may get another barn burner.  Tannercee has more talent than Vandy and more depth plus they are playing for the very job of Diddy's Baby Boy.  We should be 5-0 rolling into Columbia in October.  The Cocks, an off week, Kentucky, and then the Cocktail Party.  We had better have the train on the track by Carolina because 1) We ain't ever exactly "out coached" Spurrier, 2) Carolina and Florida will have the appropriate depth to avoid losing a war of attrition, and 3) Their offenses will be talented enough so that it will take all our D has to break their will....great as Grantham is I don't see his unit taking down the offense and defense against Carolina and Florida like with Missouri.....................................................of course then there is the looming specter of LSU or Bama.